F1 Season 2010 Predictions - review

As the new season gets going it's traditional for everyone to make a few predictions, but first it's probably a good idea to look back at my predictions for last to see how bad they really were:

1) Alonso will win the title.

Close but no cigar.  Odds on to win it at the last round but Vitaly Petrov plus the rubbish Abu Dhabi circuit meant Vettel ended up champion.

2) Better racing.

And what a season it was!  After a bit of a false start in Bohrain we were treated to an absolutely classic season, helped in no small part by the fact we had 5 drivers in the mix for most of the year.

3) Hamilton and Button are going to be pretty evenly matched, with Hamilton showing more pace but Button getting better results.

I'll claim it as a correct prediction with them both getting two wins each.  Button would have been closer to Lewis at the end if Vettel hadn't used him as a brake in Belgium, and I think Jenson has really shown his quality in what was effectively Lewis's team.  Most surprising was they seem to genuinely get on together.

4) Schuie will be quick enough to win a race or two, but the car won't be quick enough to win the title.

Well one out of two isn't bad.  Somewhat overshadowed by Nico Rosburg, Schuie never really looked quick enough to win, but the car was a dog too.

5) Driving standards will fall (because of Schuie coming back).

Hungary2011
Nuff said

6) The new teams will all be disappointingly slow.

An average of over 2 seconds off the pace. Very disappointing.  Most surprising though is that HRT finished ahead of Virgin in the table.

7) We will have at least 8 winners this year

In the end we only had 5 winners.  Alot more than some seasons, but not quite the 8 I was hoping for, mainly due to Mercedes being rubbish

 

 

So 3.5 / 7 - must try harder.  Lets see about 2011 then...

Melbourne was a blast but F1’s aero problem remains

Media_httpwwwf1fanati_bichj

In a very interesting analysis of the Australian GP, Keith notes:

"First, aerodynamics is still a big problem and fully dry races are likely to be much more processional than what we saw today.

However, because all the cars at Melbourne started on intermediate tyres none of them were forced to use both dry tyre compounds. As a result we saw some drivers pit more than others and as a result lapped quicker on fresh tyres later in the race – creating the opportunity for racing.

In the dry at Bahrain we saw no major differences in strategy among the front runners because of the mandatory pit stop rule. Removing this rule, and the requirement for the top ten qualifiers to start on the tyres they set their fastest time on should, looks like a good way of improving the quality of racing in F1. The next few races should provide more evidence for whether this is a good idea or not."

I really can't see the point of the forced tyre stop and top 10 race-on-your-quali-tyre rules. All it does is force drivers to qualify and start the race on a soft compound and switch to a hard compound early on. Drivers then will just coast to the finish, holding station and settling for points (as they did in Bahrain).

Not only is it artificial, but it also takes away driver choice and the chance for them to do something different.

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/03/28/melbourne-was-a-blast-but-f1s-aero-prob...

Media hits out at 'sad postscript ' Michael Schumacher

Media_httpenespnf1com_vtsfe

"Schumacher, however, said he was happy with his performance, after pitting early on to replace a damaged front wing. "That incident decided my race, obviously," he said."

Odd how Alonso (also last at the start) managed to get to 4th place. So much for the "Rainmaster" Schuie who struggled to pass the mighty Virgin and Torro Rosso

http://en.espnf1.com/mercedes/motorsport/story/12863.html